Olaplex N°.3 PLUS Review: It Goes On Before You Shampoo
I kept mixing this up with the K18 leave-in sitting next to it. Olaplex N°.3 PLUS goes on before you shampoo, and a month of weekly use in the right slot took the frizz out of hair that had gone brittle on me.

Paid link. I earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This review reflects my own honest experience with the product. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
My hair went brittle on me somewhere in my forties. Frizzy too, and dry in a way it never used to be. I am about to turn 49, and the change came on gradually enough that I ignored it for a while, then obviously enough that I could not. I tried rosemary oil first, then castor oil. Both sat heavy on my hair, and neither gave me anything I could count on from one week to the next. Olaplex N°.3 PLUS is the first thing that actually moved it, and I have been using it once a week for over a month.
Before anything else, the part I got tangled up myself: this goes on before you shampoo. It is a pre-wash treatment. I keep a K18 leave-in in the same lineup, the kind you put on after the shower, and I mixed the two up when I sat down to describe what I was doing. If you own more than one hair treatment, that is the easiest thing in the world to get backwards.
The good. It does the job I bought it for. The dryness and the frizz come out, and my hair is smoother now than when I started. The first time I used it I noticed less frizz and more shine, which surprised me, because the real change with this one is cumulative. The bigger difference built on top of that day-one bump, week over week, but I want to be fair to it: there was something to see immediately.
Against the oils, the difference is reliability. Rosemary and castor were hit and miss and left my hair feeling weighed down. This gives me the same result every week, with none of the heaviness. It also asks for very little. One step, once a week, worked in with the products I was already using. Nothing got displaced, and a week is a long enough gap that keeping it up has never felt like a chore.
The catch. Start with the slot, because that is the one that quietly costs you the product. This is a pre-wash treatment, and the leave-in bottles sitting next to it are not. Used outside its slot you are not using it the way it is built to work, and I cannot tell you what it does there because I use it before the shampoo. I still managed to mix it up with my K18 when I described my own routine out loud, so if you are stacking treatments, get the order straight before your first use rather than a month in.
Then patience. Past that first-use bump, the change worth having took weeks of showing up. If you want a bottle that fixes your hair by Friday, this is not it.
Then money. Olaplex is a premium brand, and a weekly treatment is a habit rather than a purchase. You will be rebuying it, and that rhythm is worth sitting with before you start.
One boundary worth naming. This is aimed at hair that has gone brittle and frizzy, mine included. Bond treatments work on damage inside the hair instead of coating the outside the way an oil or a conditioner does, which is the general reasoning behind the category. It also means this is not a blanket upgrade for hair that is already doing fine.
The verdict. If your hair has turned brittle and frizzy with age and you will actually keep to a weekly step, this is worth the money. It did what two rounds of oils could not, and it kept doing it, week after week, for over a month. Buy it with the order straight in your head, before the shampoo, and with your eyes open about the rebuy and about a payoff that arrives in weeks rather than days.
Skip it if your hair is generally shiny and behaving. A less expensive leave-in conditioner will cover what you need, and there is no reason to take on a premium habit to get there.
The good
- Less frizz and more shine, and some of it showed the first time
- It held where rosemary and castor oil did not
- One weekly step that fits a routine you already have
The catch
- Easy to put in the wrong slot if you stack treatments
- Cumulative, not an instant fix
- Premium brand, and weekly use makes it a standing cost
The verdict
Worth the money if your hair has gone brittle and frizzy with age and you will actually keep to a weekly step. It did what two rounds of heavy oils could not, and it kept doing it week after week for over a month. Buy it with the order straight in your head, before the shampoo, expecting weeks rather than days, and counting on rebuying it.
Buy it if: People whose hair has turned brittle, dry, or frizzy with age and who want a result that repeats every week instead of landing sometimes. Anyone who has already tried heavy natural oils like rosemary or castor and found them inconsistent or weighing their hair down. Anyone who will keep a once-a-week treatment going for a month or more, because that is the timeline the results need, and who is happy to slot it in before shampooing rather than after the shower.
Skip it if: Anyone whose hair is generally shiny and behaving already, where a less expensive leave-in conditioner covers the job. Anyone who wants a visible fix this week, since the change that matters is cumulative. Anyone who cannot take on a recurring premium purchase, because weekly use is the whole point. And anyone who will not keep a multi-product routine straight, since this is a pre-wash treatment and the leave-ins sitting beside it are not.
Paid link — I earn a commission.